Family Writers Press Int'l: Attacks on IPOB's DOS Driven by Profit-Seeking 'Glory Hunters'

Family Writers Press Int'l: Attacks on IPOB's DOS Driven by Profit-Seeking 'Glory Hunters' The central issue in the attacks ...

Family Writers Press Int'l: Attacks on IPOB's DOS Driven by Profit-Seeking 'Glory Hunters'

The central issue in the attacks hurled at the Directorate of State DOS of the Indigenous People Of Biafra(IPOB) is laughable, not because it has all the elements of child-like tantrum, but because it is intentional or inorganic and the people behind the attacks know exactly what they are doing. At the end of the day, it is not the no-brainer argument of the glory hunters that provokes a churning bowel movement but rather the personalities profiteering from that infamous adventure.

For the purpose of a healthy conversation or for educational purposes, what is not surreal in the never ending creation of inconsequential issues aimed at factionalizing IPOB or dislodging the fulcrum, the DOS? Indeed, the core objective of this article is not to insult Mazi Nnamdi Kanu siblings or the special interest lawyers or any wolf in sheep’s clothing parading around Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. But as a witness to the events that unfolded after the extraordinary rendition, the aim is to objectively set the record straight.

It is superfluous to think that the same people responsible for sowing seeds of discord by undermining the effective leadership order of DOS through the sabotage of the result-oriented sit-at-home and turned around to promote an agent provocateur who imported violence would mean any good for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Think about it. 

Here are posers for you. In that there will be legal consequences for a leader of a self-determination movement to be issuing orders from a government solitary confinement, is it wise for siblings of such an abducted leader to be vehemently advocating and fighting for such role for their abducted brother? 

Giving that there will be imminent division due to gap in communication owing to interception, misrepresentation and disruption from the unlawful home government, is it still wise to advocate for the abducted leader to be in charge instead of the established structure?

This is common sense. Do you really think, convincingly believe that it is sensible for an abducted leader to be dishing out orders from the enemy’s restricted cell? If your answer is affirmatively no, do you think the people undermining the leadership structure do not know what they are doing? If the answer is positive, the troubling question is: who are they working for?

Sincerely, this issue has been over flogged and has become annoying because it is a nothing burger. Let us say it in a simple layman language: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu for his own good and the survival of the Biafra restoration movement should not be anywhere near issuing orders while in the hands of the enemy. It is that simple. 

Those insisting otherwise know exactly what they are doing. They are capitalizing on a loophole in Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) that barred the DOS from accessing financial department and the itinerary of the IPOB leader. A costly mistake that should never have been; a mistake that made relatives egomaniacs and megalomaniacs.

Family Writers Press International